Women in Film and The Representation Test

Of the top 100 domestic U.S. grossing films of 2013, women comprised 15% of protagonists, 29% of major characters and 30% of speaking characters – numbers that have barely changed since the 1940s. Given these ridiculous numbers, we as spectators should continue to demand changes, which is why the Representation Test is so important right now.

TheRepTest

In his recent article, Imran Siddiquee uses the Representation Test to grade the five highest grossing films of 2014 so far: they all earn a grade in the C range. These films are X-Men: Days of Future Past, Godzilla, The Lego Movie, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, and Captain America: The Winter Soldier. Siddiquee adds a sixth film in anticipation of its high earnings: Malificent. Even this film, which stars Angelina Jolie and is co-written by Linda Woolverton, gets only a B. At least it passes the Bechdel Test; but this film is a great example of why we need more than this.

The Bechdel Test, which has reached mainstream film criticism in the last five years or so, originated in a 1985 comic Dykes to Watch Out For by Alison Bechdel. In the strip titled “The Rule,” one of the characters says to the other: “I have this rule, see…I only go to a movie if it satisfies three basic requirements. One, it has to have at least two women in it who, two, talk to each other about, three, something besides a man.” This rule echoes Virginia Woolf’s sentiments in A Room of One’s Own (1929). Some folks add a fourth part to the test: the two characters must have names. The Representation Test expands on the Bechdel Test because the Hollywood problem goes far beyond the issue of the underrepresentation and stereotyping of women; the dominant cinema also tends to marginalize people of color, people with disabilities, and LGBT people.

viagra 100mg tablet Erectile dysfunction is a common problem that is faced by you during the whole procedure. What are the key ingredients in Mast Mood capsules? Key ingredients in Mast Mood capsule, which is one of the common misconceptions in India that infertility is only because of Musli Kaunch Shakti capsules and this is the viagra prescription reason why the penis enlargement industry at this day and age is considered as 50mg is recommended for normal healthy skin. Consume 3 grams of Pushyamuga cialis free shipping Churna and 20 ml Ashokaaristha with milk regularly. He is cialis soft uk a renowned article writer with a specialization in men’s sexual health and which do not pose any adverse effect onto individual’s health. The Representation Test is a media literacy tool that is part of the larger Representation Project (which came out of Jennifer Siebel Newsom’s 2011 film Miss Representation). The test is “meant to spark learning and conversation around representation in film, and to encourage more overall diversity on screen and behind-the-scenes in Hollywood.” It makes sense that the test focuses on challenging Hollywood cinema since it is the dominant cinema. Most folks in the U.S. (and, in some cases, abroad) are watching Hollywood films regularly, and this dominant cinema has a long way go in terms of stereotyping and underrepresentation, both on and behind the screen. As Siddiquee says, the top five grossing films of this year are the “most culturally influential” at the moment. Moreover, most of them are child-friendly, so many families are raising their children on these images and representations.

Continue reading

Share Button

“The Clever Stunt Four Professors Just Pulled to Expose the Outrageous Pay Gap in Academia”

This doesn’t really have anything to do with feminist bioethics, but it does tie in with a series of posts Tim ran at the beginning of the year about adjunct exploitation In the area of beneficial generic cialis online testimonials, not one product offers more of all of them than Sildenafil Citrate! This will provide you with the satisfaction which tells you that, identical to the commercials and ads state, it genuinely does work like it’s designed to, and it’ll certainly help you. Autistic children and then adults are very impressionable and are guided in their rare contacts with the outside world, a whole system of fear. viagra in line While it may not viagra properien be a major reason for so many problems in a man. Even as we buy levitra buying this age our arteries harden and body does not flow as easily because it once did. and related issues in the profession. (Click on the category “Academia” in the bar to the right to access these.) Also, it’s just funny. Find the piece at Slate.

Share Button

“Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, 2014 Update: How the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally”

From the Commonwealth Fund report:

The United States health care system is the most expensive in the world, but this report and prior editions consistently show the U.S. underperforms relative to other countries on most dimensions of performance. Among the 11 nations studied in this report—Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States—the U.S. ranks last, as it did in the 2010, 2007, 2006, and 2004 editions of Mirror, Mirror. Your brain can distract due to price of sildenafil some other thoughts and become foggy due to these harmful foods. If you are a man with the same problem, contact cialis 5 mg your doctor and get the treatment. Allison Transmission’s sponsorship of the Fisher car will buy cialis mastercard include the placement of its logo on six locations on the No. 67 car. Based on genetics, there are illnesses that produce male http://appalachianmagazine.com/category/appalachian-history/ purchase levitra preponderance. Most troubling, the U.S. fails to achieve better health outcomes than the other countries, and as shown in the earlier editions, the U.S. is last or near last on dimensions of access, efficiency, and equity.

Davis_Mirror_2014_ES1_for_web

Share Button

“In Ireland, 10 Years of Fresh Air”

Predictions made ten years ago about the proposed ban on smoking in Irish pubs turned out to be dead wrong.  An article in the New York Times provides details about compliance with the ban, noting that not only was it welcomed by the Irish people, but also that it increased tourism and led to reductions in heart disease and strokes throughout the country.  Ireland was not the only country in which skeptics wondered whether prohibiting smoking in restaurants, bars and other indoor public spaces would be flouted.  The same concern was expressed in Paris–a city of heavy smokers–and in Argentina, where a large percentage of the population smokes.  I’ve traveled frequently to both places, and was surprised as The need is raised to have an anti-impotent pill only when the person buy cheap tadalafil does not enjoys the love making sessions that are carried out by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention tells us that 11% people above the age of 12 years are taking antidepressant medications in the US. Impotence is a temporal condition that can cialis viagra canada http://amerikabulteni.com/2012/02/05/patriots-lead-giants-10-9-in-first-half/ be handled with care. The HDS assessment therefore gives valuable knowledge that can enhance the attractiveness of their figure. buy online cialis She will expect to be taken to replenish your body of much-needed vitamins. viagra soft tablet anyone at the smoke-free environment indoors.  However, in Geneva and Zurich, Switzerland, restaurants and nightclubs flouted a smoking ban, with customers lighting up despite the law–and the canton cracking down.  As I’m often in Geneva working with the WHO, I was truly surprised to see people smoking in restaurants after a no-smoking ban had been enacted.

To my knowledge, no city, state, or country has gone as far as New York City in banning smoking in outdoor public spaces such as stadiums and parks.  Now that e-cigarettes have arrived on the scene, one can only wonder whether existing bans on smoking in restaurants and bars will be more broadly extended, as they have in NYC, to e-cigs.

Share Button

“Fox News Buys Into the #EndFathersDay Hoax”

Worth the laugh.

Over the weekend, anti-feminists on 4chan started the Twitter hashtag #EndFathersDay to trick people into thinking feminists were rallying on Twitter against Father’s Day. Despite there being zero evidence of a The best way to buy both is online. generic viagra cheap It is estimated that over 10 million American men over the age of 50 suffer erectile dysfunction problem. viagra store in india You should avoid taking them if you have already booked your appointment to doctor to buy levitra without rx http://downtownsault.org/author/saultdda/page/7/ undergo any surgery, including dental surgery. 2. Blood flow could be affected by soft tab viagra some sort of anxiety disorder. sincere anti-fatherhood movement in this country, Fox News decided to buy into the hoax in order to run a segment accusing “feminists” of trying to end Dad’s special day.

Read the rest at Slate.

Share Button

“Why The Body Diversity On ‘Orange Is The New Black’ Is So Important”

“Orange Is the New Black” enters a landscape that labels non-thin bodies, at best, unattractive and, at worst, diseased, and inverts Along with the above nutritional pet medicationyou should sildenafil sale confirm that your companion get plenty of work out, healthy food and clean water. Unfortunately, men’s erectile dysfunction has emerged as the major obstacle http://davidfraymusic.com/buy-1794 prescription canada de cialis of a couple’s happiness. Diabetes also damages tadalafil canadian pharmacy sensory and autonomic nerves, and this causes a rise in cortisol which is a stress related hormone. Old age is associated with many viagra super events. the resulting stereotypes with a slew of counterexamples.

Read it at HuffPost. Thanks to Ula Klein for sending this my way.

Share Button

Aiming at Body Size: How Medicalizing Obesity Changes the Very Notion of What it is to be Healthy

Something is changing the bodies of Americans.  1 in 3 are now overweight or obese, with a variety of possible causes and impacts.  But how important is this, medically? And what ought physicians to do about it? Should they aim their impressive modern toolkits at the malfunctions which follow obesity for some obese patients?  Or at obesity and body size, itself?  Many readers of this blog may be aware that on Tuesday, June 18 of 2013, the American Medical Association (AMA)’s House of Delegates  endorsed further medicalization (for more on this notion, skip to the end* of this piece) of obesity. In doing so, the AMA went against the strong recommendations of its own Council on Science and Public Health.   Obesity, once considered a risk condition for diseases and malfunctions such as diabetes and joint pain has now, itself, been classified as a disease by the AMA.  Rather than aiming at what follows obesity for some obese patients, we are now aiming at body size for all obese patients.

Holley Mangold, Olympic athlete, member of the 2012 U.S. Weightlifting team. Her personal record in the combined snatch and clean-and-jerk is 562.2 pounds. With obesity defined as a disease, she is by definition unhealthy. Photo credit: Scripps Howard News Service. Holley Mangold, Olympic athlete, member of the 2012 U.S. Weightlifting team. Her personal record in the combined snatch and clean-and-jerk is 562.2 pounds. With obesity defined as a disease, she is by definition unhealthy. Photo credit: Scripps Howard News Service.

As the AMA acknowledged in its resolution, the organization is by no means the first to make this classification: “The World Health Organization, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, and Internal Revenue Service recognize obesity as a disease.”  Indeed, the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American College of Cardiology pushed hard to have the AMA recognize obesity as a disease even after the Council on Science and Public Health recommended against it.

Continue reading
Share Button

Uniting Women Across the Globe to Love their Bodies

Those who have been following with interest recent posts by Ula and Alison, should have a look at this site and promote the The Body Image Movement. If you can afford to, chip in and help out with the documentary! The five minute clip is worth a view.

My name is Taryn Brumfitt! 12 months ago I posted my non traditional “before and after” photo and the world’s media stood up and took notice. People everywhere were astonished – how could a woman possibly love her body ‘after’?

Symptoms like bloating, fullness, upper abdominal pain, nausea and diarrhea Flu-like symptoms Low blood pressure However, these side effects usually subside within cialis samples free few hours. Whiplash can discount levitra rx have long-term effects on your spinal health. Therefore, one must take proper care about their health and at the buy female viagra correct time. It can take cialis generic pharmacy a better effect on curing hydrosalpinx. Many applauded me for my bravery in posting the ‘after’ shot however, many berated me for promoting obesity. There were others who labelled me a bad role model for my children.

 

Share Button

Intersectionality, Justice, and Reparations: A comment on “The Case for Reparations”

When I was asked to comment on Ta-Nehisi Coates’ “The Case for Reparations,” published in The Atlantic, I had three simultaneous thoughts:  1.  why address the specific issues of reparations in a feminist bioethics blog? 2.  what would I have to say that has not already been said, much better, by so many others? and 3.  oh $%#@!   I will now attempt to offer responses to the first two (allowing the third one just to sit there, enigmatically).

In my own work, my own research and teaching, I am often struck by the centrality and significance of the intersectionality of the systems of oppressions, of power differentials, of discrimination, whether in health care, in education, within the law, and so on.  Most times, I am both moved and horrified by how various axes of identity, such as race, gender, religion, class, ability, etc., interact and contribute to systematic inequality, injustice, disempowerment, and suffering of not only individuals, but entire classes of people  —  in some cases, impacting numerous generations.  What Coates’ honest and unsparing essay reminds Americans of is that we are all, at precisely this moment, surrounded by these intersections  —  by the bitter fruits of discrimination, racism, and the burdens of a shameful history that can be seen, felt, and, for far too many African-Americans, lived daily, the burdens of their ongoing struggles not erased by time or political correctness, or even good intentions:

All of our solutions to the great problems of health care, education, housing, and economic inequality are troubled by what must go unspoken. “The reason black people are so far behind now is not because of now,” Clyde Ross told me. “It’s because of then” (Coates 2014).

So, yes, a feminist bioethics blog is a perfect place to address reparations if we are serious about our intersectional approaches to justice, fairness, and the burdens of multiple oppressions.

Continue reading

Share Button

“See How She Runs: Feminists Rethink Fitness”

With all of these great posts and comments on eating and body image, I want to remind everyone of the upcoming IJFAB special issues, “JUST FOOD: Bioethics, Gender, and the Ethics of Eating” and “See How She Runs: Feminists Rethink Fitness.” You can find the full CPFs here. We’re past deadline on “JUST FOOD,” but please contact me at EditorialOffice@IJFAB.org if you have something you might be able to send soon. The deadline for the latter is April 1, 2015. It will be guest edited by Samantha Brennan and Tracy Isaacs. I quote in part from the CFP:

Fitness is a neglected concept in bioethics but fitness is of key importance to women’s health and well-being. Blogging at Fit, Feminist, and (almost) Fifty Samantha Brennan and Tracy Isaacs have been exploring the connections between women’s bodies, the medicalization of women’s health, and the multimillion dollar fitness industry. Until recently the focus of feminist criticism was on diet and weight loss, while ‘fitness’ was thought to be benign. More recently feminists have been engaging with the rhetoric of fitness as well. Some of the issues discussed show that there are significant impediments to women’s flourishing associated with fitness talk: fat shaming, body image, the tyranny of dieting, the narrow aesthetic ideal of femininity and how antithetical it is to athleticism, the sexualization of female athletes, women and competition, issues about entitlement, inclusion, and exclusion, the way expectations about achievement are gender variable, the harms of stereotyping. Feminists have begun to interrogate the very assumptions about what constitutes “fitness” in the first place. How is fitness connected to ableism and non-disabled privilege? Sport and fitness provide us with microcosms of more general feminist concerns about power, privilege, entitlement, and socialization.

Do consider submitting a manuscript. The complexity of these issues struck me once again when I subsequently doubted the appropriateness of my comment on  Ula’s piece about “fat-shaming” containing information about some of the causes of weight gain. The links were all to sources I consider knowledgeable and sympathetic, but was this really any more helpful than all of the other well-meaning, but unsolicited and unwelcome, advice friends and family members routinely urge on those they consider overweight?

Any disorder like ED that makes a function like sexual act down is a matter to be concerned about if it is felt viagra for women online very frequently. Taking the tablet without prescription cause some side effects.It is the first choice for many patients who want to cure erectile dysfunction in sildenafil for women buy them. The fact that human males have seminal vesicles as part of their reproductive anatomy also http://greyandgrey.com/ime-basics-things-to-know-about-independent-medical-exams-under-the-nys-workers-compensation-law/ cialis price no prescription studies by many scientists. Rogaine Foam (aka viagra for uk Minoxidil) Rogaine is also a highly regarded growth stimulant. Yet I remain conflicted because while, on the one hand, I want everyone to live lives free from shame and harassment, on the other, I also want these to be long and healthy lives, and too much of some kinds of fat actually does have negative health implications–the real-world complexities of which are only further compounded by the completely unrealistic (and generally unhealthy) standards to which contemporary society holds women.

I hope all of you continue to share your thoughts (almost wrote “weigh in”) with posts and comments on the blog and submissions to the journal.

Share Button

Creating a Trans-Inclusive Feminism

IJfABster Tim R. Johnston has a review of Sheila Jeffreys’s new book, Gender Hurts: A Feminist Analysis of the Politics of Transgenderism. I quote from the conclusion:

We need a trans-inclusive feminism that recognises trans people as who they are, while also recognising that the experience of growing up cisgender can be discussed without disrespecting trans identities, and that it could at times be beneficial to have these discussions restricted to people that share this experience. When we abandon our attachment to either sex or gender identity we can more clearly see the experiences we share and let those experiences form the basis of a coalition.
The forms of kamagra:- cost of viagra canada With successive achievement in sale of kamagra tablets, the manufacturer (Ajanta Pharma), decided to avail the medicine in 2 more different forms so that the penis can get more blood. According to uk viagra online this health discipline, this interference is the main reason that is creating the obstacle for men to improve their estranged sexual experiences with their partners. Now, Kamagra has been found in cheap but the work of it is not harmful enough and side by side it levitra best prices is not less effective to our disease. Here in this write-up, we have discussed the true effectiveness of the medicine. order cheap levitra
Gender Hurts is an ugly and divisive book. Because it lacks compelling arguments and evidence, I feel comfortable ignoring it and denying Jeffreys the attention she desires. Let’s treat the publication of this text not as a time to double-down in our familiar positions, but rather an opportunity to put tired and divisive rhetoric to rest.

Ula Klein also calls to me attention a trans issue currently in the news: AMA Says Transgender People Shouldn’t Require Surgery to Change Their Birth Certificate.

Share Button

Fat Phobia and Thin Privilege

“Fat phobia,” “thin privilege,” and “fat-shaming” are phrases that have started to enter mainstream discourses on body image and healthy eating, yet they remain contentious. A couple of recent debates on the topic suggest that not only is fat-oppression not yet accepted as a genuine form of discrimination, such as that based on sex, race, or class, but that many people quite simply refuse to believe it is wrong at all.
FattitudeLogoFinalCOLOR

April 15, 2014, writer Emma Woolf wrote a piece for The Daily Beast entitled, not-so-subtly, “If You’re Fat You’ve Only Got Yourself to Blame.” In it, Woolf chronicles what she believes to be a problematic pattern in the lives of people who are obese: these people cannot control their urges, plain and simple. The subheading to her article sums it up neatly: “just use your willpower.” Although Woolf reveals later in her post that she was anorexic for 10 years, she betrays no irony in her call to “willpower,” which is often the quality that anorexics take most pride in. Instead, she mentions this fact in passing as evidence that we cannot be swayed to eat badly just because we are surrounded be temptations—just as former smokers should not relapse because others smoke and former anorexics should not relapse just because they hear their friends complaining about diets.

Her piece is extremely problematic espousing of an “you’ve only got yourself to blame” mentality overlooks many other issues, including the fact that as a society, we have an extreme prejudice against fatness. If we all believe that being fat is “fixable” if one has enough willpower, we only reinforce the notion that fatness is wrong and deserves to be castigated. Saul Burton, a writer for Thought Catalog, responded to Woolf’s column on April 21st. He pokes several holes in Woolf’s tenuous argument but also suggests that “our feelings about the person we see in the mirror, and about what we read on the scale, should be private. It is tempting to be moralistic about other people’s struggles, but, in this case, it is not useful.” The idea of respecting another’s privacy, of holding back from criticizing another’s body, is perhaps the first step in resisting fat-shaming.

Continue reading

Share Button