Reminded

Note from the Editor: This is a guest post about the difficulties trans* people often encounter when seeking medical care.  Medical care can be difficult to navigate in the best circumstances, but when your gender and documentation don’t agree, or your gender presentation and your body clash, it can be not only difficult but emotionally damaging to interact with medical professionals.  Sayer Johnson is a run-of-the-mill Midwestern transgender man trying to navigate basic healthcare and share his human experience.

Reminded

Today I was reminded. Not in the sweet way that comes from a child fusing a new name with a new beard. Not in the quiet acceptance of a neighbor who, without skipping a beat, went from my old name to Papi. Not in the funny way that can come from the mouth of my always insightful six year old. Nevertheless reminded. Reminded in the bitter way that the media often reminds me. Reminded in the unfortunate way that  humanity sometimes does.  Reminded in my own community. Reminded why I continue to live my life out loud.

Continue reading

Share Button

“Penn State Administrators Target Women Employees”

“Penn State Administrators Target Women Employees” From the Centre Daily Times: “Under Penn State’s new employee wellness program, a health risk assessment questionnaire asks female employees if they plan to get pregnant in the next year. If the employee doesn’t want … Continue reading

Share Button

“TX women bring abortion fight to world of video games”

Although we have entered 21st century, but men of today do not want to talk about their erectile dysfunction or premature ejaculation problems, there are those who sit for hours on the internet researching for the best results, make it … Continue reading

Share Button

“New Video Game Challenges Users To Navigate Texas’ Harsh Abortion Restrictions”

Read more about the An erection viagra no prescription canada is where the large chambers in your penis fill with blood which lead to rapid expansion. The Psoriasis-Ltd III “penetrates and migrates” so only a 0.5 second application or a … Continue reading

Share Button

CALL FOR PAPERS: Workshop on Global Surrogacy and Reproductive Markets

CALL FOR PAPERS: Workshop on Global Surrogacy and Reproductive Markets Carleton University/University of Ottawa, February 6-8, 2014 International surrogacy consists in a transactional arrangement wherein a first world couple or individual seeking to build a family contracts the gestational services … Continue reading

Share Button

Obesity: Two Articles

First, from Scientific American: Turning the tables on obesity and BMI: When more can be better. “While obese and unhealthy people suffer from the highest mortality, people with normal BMI can also be quite unhealthy and be near the upper … Continue reading

Share Button

Embryo Sex Selection Shouldn’t Be Illegal

This commentary was initially posted on August 16, 2013 on the Impact Ethics blog and is reposted here with permission of the authors. Visit impactethics.ca

Stephen Wilkinson and Eve Garrard respond to Alana Cattapan’s blog post calling for the continuing prohibition on embryo sex selection.

______________________________________________________________________

Alana Cattapan raises many important questions about our objections to the current legal prohibition on embryo sex selection within IVF (not sex-selective abortion), in the UK and other relevantly similar countries. We are grateful for this opportunity to comment.

Law and Morality: Our report, Eugenics and the Ethics of Selective reproduction, isn’t about the ethics of IVF sex selection per se, but about the defensibility of a legal prohibition on IVF sex selection.  We hold that, while some instances of sex selection are morally problematic, the case in favour of a ban is insufficiently strong.  Using the powers of the state to impose legal restrictions on people’s reproductive behaviour is a serious, and potentially dangerous, business and something to be done cautiously and only for compelling reasons.  Sometimes there are such reasons – we don’t support an entirely laissez-faire position – but, in the case of sex selection, a conclusive case hasn’t been made.  We don’t claim that sex selection is desirable, or even that most cases of it are morally acceptable.  Our conclusion is just that the case for legal prohibition is insufficiently strong to overturn the presumption of reproductive freedom.

Continue reading
Share Button

Rethinking Sex Selection: A Feminist Critique

This commentary was initially posted on August 13, 2013 on the Impact Ethics blog and is reposted here with permission of the author. Visit impactethics.ca

Alana Cattapan argues the harm done to women through sex selection is sufficient reason to continue the prohibition.

In a recent report on “Eugenics and the Ethics of Selective Reproduction,” published in July 2013, Stephen Wilkinson and Eve Garrard step into much-contested terrain, challenging orthodoxies of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). In their essay on sex selection—which caught the attention of media outlets throughout the United Kingdom (herehere & here) —the authors argue that there is no ethical justification for the UK prohibition on sex selection using PGD.

Continue reading
Share Button

“Surrogacy” and Parental Licensing

Christine Overall insists that the well-being of children born of “surrogacy” arrangements should be of paramount importance and, most certainly, should take precedence over the wants of prospective parents. This commentary was initially posted on July 18, 2013 on the Impact Ethics blog and is reposted here with permission of the author. Visit impactethics.ca

“Surrogacy” is not illegal in Canada; paying or offering payment to a “surrogate” mother is. According to Section 6 (1) of the Assisted Human Reproduction Act (AHCR Act), “No person shall pay consideration to a female person to be a surrogate mother, offer to pay such consideration or advertise that it will be paid.” This prohibition notwithstanding, the plan is to permit reimbursement for legitimate (receipted) expenses. Section 12 (1) of the AHR Act stipulates, “No person shall, except in accordance with the regulations, … (c) reimburse a surrogate mother for an expenditure incurred by her in relation to her surrogacy.” As the relevant regulations have not been crafted, this exception to the legal prohibition is not yet in force. Meanwhile, there are many media reports of cases of paid and altruistic “surrogacy” in Canada (click here for more information).

Continue reading
Share Button

FAB in Mexico

A message from FAB Co-Coordinator Jackie Leach Scully: Since 1996 the International Network on Feminist Approaches to Bioethics (FAB) has held a biannual World Congress, and next year sees us gathering in Mexico City from 22-24 June 2014. This runs … Continue reading

Share Button

FAB in Mexico

A message from FAB Co-Coordinator Jackie Leach Scully: Since 1996 the International Network on Feminist Approaches to Bioethics (FAB) has held a biannual World Congress, and next year sees us gathering in Mexico City from 22-24 June 2014. This runs … Continue reading

Share Button

“We are Egg Donors”

This commentary was initially posted on July 11, 2013 on the Impact Ethics blog and is reposted here with permission of the author. Visit impactethics.ca Claire Burns, Raquel Cool and Sierra Falter co-founded We Are Egg Donors, the world’s first self-advocacy … Continue reading

Share Button