The excellent Nursing Clio blog has an entry by Ashley Baggett called “The Battle of the Sexes in Health Care.” In the entry, Baggett critiques a NPR commentary on a recent scholarly article in The Lancet on gender and public health in a global context. The issue of whether or not—and if so, the degree to which—there is gender-based discrimination in health research, public health programmes, and patient-provider relationships is a critical one. The role that gender and sex may play As a navigate here cialis 20 mg result, they are left alone with no solution. The feeling of love and sexual excitement take levitra uk http://www.learningworksca.org/about/leadership/ place in brain. Aphrodisiacs or sex-stimulating medicines are often used learningworksca.org viagra free as libido-boosters. So strengthen your pelvic muscles for sexual endurance and for prolonging your cialis online sales intercourse duration. in disease more generally is also one worth attending to, as Mary Ann G. Cutter did in her recent book The Ethics of Gender-Specific Disease (if interested, see my review in the Spring 2013 APA Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy). It’s worth giving thought to any or all of these considerations of the role that gender and sex play in the provision of health care in any nation and globally. And then, to how much of a role they ought to play.
Tuesday night, Senator Wendy Davis, a very vocal supporting crowd at the Texas capitol, and very engaged online communities fought for women’s reproductive rights in Texas.
And won.
The issue, if you haven’t heard — and you may not have, as mainstream media ignored this yesterday (most hilariously on CNN, where the caloric value of blueberry muffins were discussed during the climax in the TX Senate) — the issue was Texas Senate Bill 5. This bill would make illegal any abortions “at or later than 20 weeks post-fertilization” on the basis that “substantial medical evidence recognizes that an unborn child is capable of experiencing pain by not later than 20 weeks after fertilization” (SB5). This, along with other restrictions about meeting ambulatory care facility standards, would restrict the number of abortion providers in the state of Texas by 80-90%, leaving just five. FIVE PROVIDERS. For the entire state of Texas.
Continue reading