Medication and Aging

There have been recent reports on the over-medicalization of older individuals in nursing homes and assisted living residences. This problem is not a new one.

Just imagine: you are overworked and there is not enough staff to take care of everyone. There is a resident that wanders all over the place and you cannot keep an eye on him. Or, there is a woman that keeps repeating the same half sentence every 20 seconds of so. Visitors might find it amusing but hearing this in the course of several hours, every day, non-stop, is driving you crazy. Here is another scenario: you are somewhat trained in elder care but do not have the tools or the time to deal with a troublesome resident who may get violent. The man in room 24 keeps yelling and swearing; you need to calm him down because the family of another resident is complaining. They say they pay good money and they do not like to hear swearing. How do you stop Mister B from spitting on you or stealing his neighbor’s cookies? How do you control unwanted behavior? How do you cope?

Drugs that can control behavior such as antipsychotic medications seem like a good answer to all your problems. Although it is the ancillary care staff that deal with these front line issues, it is the physician who prescribes. But you might just be thankful that he or she does that so that you can go ahead with your job of cleaning messes and bringing food. You get the job done, and everyone seems more or less controlled at the end of your shift; your supervisor is pleased. More than likely there were many under you care so you did not have much time to ponder the mental state of your charges. You can go home and be happy that at least everyone who was under your care got washed and fed in a timely manner. Even if the pay is bad, you know that you can keep your job at least for the immediate future.

Administering a prostate massage poorly could result in viagra the pill a trip to the emergency room. It was permitted by the FDA in 1982 for the healing of stern spots in cialis generika 40mg citizens elder than 13 years of age. Whenever there is health issue, people are advised to buy drugs online because it is a jelly form of medicine that gets dissolved after keeping for sometime in the mouth. ‘Ajanta Pharma’ is the manufacturer of this medicine and ‘tadalafil’ is the main ingredient used ordering viagra from india in this product and has been manufactured to maintain erection and to eliminate the very root of impotency. We can counteract this effect by simply increasing prices viagra generic the blood flow- usually with a muscle relaxer.

NPR is doing a series on the issue of medication in nursing homes, “Old and Overmedicated.” I was glancing at the many comments the series has been generating. It is rather telling that the reason medication is now being questioned is the adverse health effects it is generating. I wonder whether the question would have been raised at all if the medications had not been found to be harmful. What is the premise for medicating someone? To control them but why do we need to control them? Some nursing home administrator would respond that this is the best way to ensure good care is provided. Immediately, I think, really is that the best way?

The latest is installment of the series focuses on a nursing home that emphasizes activities. Not surprisingly keeping individuals busy is a way of getting them to behave or at least to control some of their outbursts. This nursing home (Ecumen) has found that they could reduce the use of medication and especially antipsychotic drugs by doing activities with the residents. Funny that–human contact can be beneficial! This story reminds me of a case I encountered a few years back. This resident was in a room by himself and could not participate in activities because of the nature of his cognitive disabilities. Since the nursing home could provide him with any type of human contact except the one he had when he was fed or toileted, he was spending most of his time alone. He was somewhat agitated and would yell often, but the nursing home staff just assumed it was his nature. His family got him a companion who would sit, watch television and do activities with him. The resident became calmer; the power of human companionship! The lesson here is to increase staffing in nursing homes. Unfortunately, for-profit homes (and even non-profit ones) do not necessarily gauge their care according to calmness or serenity of the residents. Rather they measure pressure sores, bruises and weigh the residents to make sure they are not starving. If they can give this basic care and get the residents to cooperate through powerful medication and if they perceive this method of achieving a clean and fed body as more expedient, then they will simply stick with the tried and true method. In addition to the mindset that perceives pill popping as a surer means, there is another assumption at work. It is that people with dementia or those that have severe cognitive disabilities do not readily relate to others; they are ‘other’ and unreachable. However, anyone who has spent any time with such persons realizes this is false. This brings me to another point and a concern that I have had for some time. The work of a care aid or a personal worker is far more than simply feeding and cleaning: it is being there for someone who is isolated. If only nursing homes or the system that allows nursing homes to operate as they do would take into consideration the many facets of caring for another human being, then staffing would be increased and care workers would be given the training and the time they need to perform their job in a caring manner.

Share Button

Comments

Medication and Aging — 1 Comment

  1. Yeah, here in Australia we kill up to 6,000 nursing home residents every year with the overprescription of neuroleptics.

    The dirty little secret is that these pills were never meant to be therapeutic. They were originally called ‘major tranquillisers’ and were developed specifically to control violent prisoners and asylum inmates. It was only during the 60s when it started occurring to some people that maybe the insane and demented still had human rights that the D2 dopamine pathway theory of schizophrenia was developed and retrofitted as a justification for what had long been SOP in mental institutions. (The serotonin theory of depression was likewise invented to justify SSRI prescription and – like the dopamine theory of schizophrenia – has no evidential support whatsoever and a fair amount of experimental evidence contradicting it).

    Viola! Oppressive major tranquillisers are now therapeutic antipsychotics. And indeed, they do suppress most positive symptoms of psychosis (while aggravating some negative ones), but so does ECT, insulin shock or a solid whack to the back of the head. What’s more, the long term prognosis for those with psychotic illness in third world countries who can’t afford antipsychotics is better than for those in the West who will almost inevitably receive them – often without their consent. According to Robert Whitaker in Anatomy of an Epidemic antipsychotics actually aggravate psychotic illness.

    Psychosocial and therapeutic community approaches to managing dementia and mental illness have been tried before and they not only work better than the ‘keep them in bed and doped to the eyeballs’ approach but, contrary to widespread belief, they are no more expensive. Trieste in Italy reformed it’s entire mental health system along such lines and has long enjoyed better results at lower costs than comparable cities.

    All of this has been well known since at least the early 80s but the pill approach is still preferred and Loren Mosher’s highly successful Soteria system has been pretty much closed down in the US, though it’s inspired several imitators in Europe.

    Why?

    Big Pharma lobbying and PR is, as usual, at least partly to blame. But the real cause is conservative inertia reinforced by the stigma surrounding dementia and mental illness.

    Doctors aren’t going to get sued for prescribing neuroleptics to the mentally ill – even if it kills them – but they could very well be sued if they don’t do so and the patient hurts herself or someone else. Safer (for the doctor) to keep them zombified with drugs that deplete neurons in their frontal lobes (along with many other nasty side-effects).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.